Monthly Archives: February 2014

Is the Shasta County Sheriff Deputies Assaulting Cannabis Petitioners

From: chris – January 1, 1970

Is this for MCLR or CCHI I agree with Mike that the video is not clear enough as to what happened beforehand but it does appear that the petitioner was walking away when he was grabbed and sounded like he was being polite and cooperative. It doesn’t look like he was blocking anything and it does look like a violation of Pruneyard as Bill Panzer suggested pasted below. Please keep me posted. Chris Conrad Court-qualified cannabis expert witness consultant PO Box 21106 El Sobrante CA 94820(phone#-removed);(phone#-removed) fax chrisconrad.com casechrisconrad.com On 22814 7:05 AM “Debbie Tharp” wrote: > well craig rick and i are facing the same set of problems in riverside > county. i was happy to hear last night he finally got shasta filed because > riverside has been slowed down by the fact that two days after we put the pros > on the street they arrested one of my best. now the rumor floats around that > if you work riverside you will get arrested. the cops knew just what to do to > slow us down. its not really stopping us though. still gotta get this done. > local actions happening everywhere > > On 22314 11:29 AM “wgpanzerearthlink.net” wrote: > Is the Shasta County Sheriff Deputies Assaulting Cannabis Petitioners > >> Whether or not the sheriff acted legally depends on where the signatures were >> being gathered. The video doesn’t supply enough info to determine this. >> There are specific rules about where signatures may be gathered based on the >> Pruneyard case. I represented two guys who suffered a citizen’s arrest by >> a Safeway assistant manager while collecting petition signatures for Prop >> 215. All criminal charges were dismissed and we successfully sued Safeway. >> >> Bill Panzer >> > On Feb 20 2014 7:49 PM “Craig Beresh” > wrote: >> >> See the video What do you think about this What do you think we can do >> about this The are legally collecting signatures and registering people to >> vote. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> www.californiacannabiscoalition.org >> >> >> >> — >> You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. >> >> To post to this group send email to >> savecannabisa2c2.us >> >> To Unsubscribe from this group send email to >> savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us >> >> View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org >> — >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> “Save Cannabis” group. >> For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an >> email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us >> . > > — > You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. > > To post to this group send email to > savecannabisa2c2.us > > To Unsubscribe from this group send email to > savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us > > View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org > — > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > “Save Cannabis” group. > For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us. — You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. To post to this group send email to savecannabisa2c2.us To Unsubscribe from this group send email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org — You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Save Cannabis” group. For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usdoptout. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us.

San Diego Cannabis Ordinance: Essentially a Ban

From: craig – January 1, 1970

The San Diego Ordinance: Essentially a Ban Since the vote this week I have heard dozens of responses on how they feel about the possibility of legal dispensaries in the City of San Diego. Many are excited at the chance to see legal regulated facilities that will not face constant harassment by the City. Others are disappointed at the requirements amendments fees and overall restrictive nature of the ordinance. In the end this ordinance supported by many so-called dispensary supporters is essentially a ban. San Diego did it again In reviewing the ordinance one can plainly see the detailed restrictions that will be placed on dispensaries. Only a handful of zones will be authorized; distance requirements between dispensaries; distance requirements between dispensaries and sensitive uses such as schools parks and daycare facilities; distance requirements from residential areas; caps on the number of dispensaries in each district. The list goes on. What many people dont understand is the process they will have to go through to obtain a level 3 conditional use permit. It starts with an application an 875 application fee and an 8000 deposit. Any costs associated with the application are to be paid by the applicant hence the initial 8000 deposit. Estimates for overall fees are in the range of 8000-24000 and there is no guarantee that the permit will be granted. Once the application has been processed and reviewed a hearing with a hearing officer will be set. This is a public hearing that will allow open comment from people in that district. If residents from that district do not want dispensaries they will put pressure on their Councilmember who in turn may put pressure on the hearing officer to deny the permit. If the permit is denied the applicant may file an appeal which will be heard by the local planning commission. Unfortunately the local planning commission may very well succumb to the same pressure as the hearing officer and deny the permit. If this is the case the applicant would have minimal recourse as their avenues for appeal have been exhausted. In the end this ordinance does little to provide any access to medical marijuana for those who need it. Even if a handful of permits get granted the majority of San Diego residents will have to travel unreasonable distances in order to obtain their medicine. It appears that the San Diego City Council did not learn its lesson after the last restrictive ordinance was successfully overturned via the referendum process in 2011. Instead it decided to propose the same ordinance with additional restrictions. Knowing the San Diego medical marijuana community I have a strong feeling that this ordinance will never see the books. There is already talk of another referendum. Michael E. Cindrich Law Offices of Michael E. Cindrich APC San Diego Norml California Cannabis Coalition Craig Beresh San Diego Norml California Cannabis Coalition — You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. To post to this group send email to savecannabisa2c2.us To Unsubscribe from this group send email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org — You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Save Cannabis” group. For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usdoptout. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us.

Is the Shasta County Sheriff Deputies Assaulting Cannabis Petitioners

From: votedebbietharp – January 1, 1970

well craig rick and i are facing the same set of problems in riverside county. i was happy to hear last night he finally got shasta filed because riverside has been slowed down by the fact that two days after we put the pros on the street they arrested one of my best. now the rumor floats around that if you work riverside you will get arrested. the cops knew just what to do to slow us down. its not really stopping us though. still gotta get this done. local actions happening everywhere On Feb 20 2014 7:49 PM “Craig Beresh” wrote: > > See the video What do you think about this What do you think we can do > about this The are legally collecting signatures and registering people to > vote. > > > > > https:www.youtube.comwatchvVVUmDfLan4Y&featureyoutubegdataplayer > > > > www.californiacannabiscoalition.org > > — > You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. > > To post to this group send email to > savecannabisa2c2.us > > To Unsubscribe from this group send email to > savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us > > View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org > — > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > “Save Cannabis” group. > For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout > . > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us. > — You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. To post to this group send email to savecannabisa2c2.us To Unsubscribe from this group send email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org — You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Save Cannabis” group. For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us.

Is the Shasta County Sheriff Deputies Assaulting Cannabis Petitioners

From: craig – January 1, 1970

https:www.facebook.comphoto.php(phone#-removed)779&setvb(phone#-removed)548&type2&theater This incident did happen at Safeway. Here is interview with the victim. On Sunday February 23 2014 11:11:36 AM UTC-7 Bob Bowerman wrote: > You are correct > Bob > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 23 2014 at 9:22 AM “Mike Boutin” > wrote: > > I think you all are reaching. I think there isn’t enough evidence of > anything except a cop telling someone something and they ignored it. I > think a lot went on before the video starts. I think that it was probably > private property and the owners said “not here” > I think when we over reach and defend anything that comes along we lose. > That’s what “I” think. > > —————————— > From: “Craig Beresh” > > To: saveca…a2c2.us > Sent: Wednesday February 19 2014 8:03:06 PM > Subject: Save Cannabis Is the Shasta County Sheriff Deputies > Assaulting Cannabis Petitioners > > > See the video What do you think about this What do you think we can do > about this The are legally collecting signatures and registering people to > vote. > > > > > > https:www.youtube.comwatchvVVUmDfLan4Y&featureyoutubegdataplayer > > > > www.californiacannabiscoalition.org > > — > You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. > > To post to this group send email to > saveca…a2c2.us > > To Unsubscribe from this group send email to > savecannabis…a2c2.us > > View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org > — > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > “Save Cannabis” group. > For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout > . > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to savecannabis…a2c2.us . > > — > You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. > > To post to this group send email to > saveca…a2c2.us > > To Unsubscribe from this group send email to > savecannabis…a2c2.us > > View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org > — > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > “Save Cannabis” group. > For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout > . > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an > email to savecannabis…a2c2.us . > > — You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. To post to this group send email to savecannabisa2c2.us To Unsubscribe from this group send email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org — You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Save Cannabis” group. For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us.

Referendum to end grow ban in Shasta county completed

From: craig – January 1, 1970

At 4:20 yesterday California Cannabis Coalition and the people of Shasta county turned in the referendum to reverse the grow ban. We started late and in 3 weeks we where able to get the signatures with a 20 overage of valid signatures. Now the registrar of voters will verify the signatures. then back to county supervisors for a vote to repeal or take to election.. When the voter registrar verify the signatures it will mark the 6th referendum we have completed resulting in reversal of cannabis bans in California. for more info: www.californiacannabiscoalition.org Craig — You received this message because you are part of the SaveCannabis group. To post to this group send email to savecannabisa2c2.us To Unsubscribe from this group send email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us View Archives at http:SaveCannabis.org — You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Save Cannabis” group. For more options visit https:groups.google.comaa2c2.usgroupsoptout. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to savecannabis unsubscribea2c2.us.