*I GUARANTEE THIS IS WHAT AB2312 WILL LOOK LIKE:*
 
Rhode Island implemented this bill; it authorizes only THREE Medical
Marijuana Centers; Allowed only to grow 99 plants or produce only 93 lbs at
any one time; FOR THE ENTIRE STATE; yeah small state; but are you flipping
kidding me; THAT'S LIBERATION OF CANNABIS? THAT'S AB2312.
 
 
 
Rhode Island: Governor Signs Legislation Authorizing State-Licensed Medical
Marijuana 'Compassion
Centers'<http://norml.org/news/2012/05/31/rhode-island-governor-signs-legislation-authorizing-state-licensed-medical-marijuana-compassion-centers>
**
 
*Providence, RI:* Governor Lincoln Chafee signed
legislation<http://www.cqstatetrack.com/texis/walks/ri/status.html?billnum=2555&type=S&year=12>into
law last week
authorizing<http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wrni/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1932457/Top.Stories/Gov..Chafee.signs.bill.allowing.medical.marijuana.dispensaries>the
creation of state-licensed 'compassion centers' to engage in the
production and distribution of cannabis for authorized patients. It is the
second time since 2009 that state lawmakers have approved legislation
allowing for the state regulation of medical marijuana facilities.
 
Under the new law, Senate Bill
2555<http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText12/SenateText12/S2555A.pdf>,
health regulators will license three not-for-profit entities, known as
'compassion centers,' to operate within the state. Compassion centers will
not be allowed to cultivate more than 150 cannabis plants on the premises
at any one time, only 99 of which may be mature. Centers will also be
restricted to possessing no more than 1,500 ounces of usable product at any
one time.
 
Lawmakers have suggested that the imposed statutory limits will lower the
likelihood of federal law enforcement officials
interfering<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-armentano/medical-marijuana-obama-_b_858204.html>with
the implementation of the law. At least one other state, New Mexico,
imposes<http://norml.org/news/2010/12/23/new-mexico-revised-regulations-allow-for-licensed-production-of-up-to-150-medical-marijuana-plants>similar
caps on authorized dispensaries.
 
State lawmakers initially enacted
legislation<http://norml.org/news/2009/06/18/rhode-island-state-to-license-medical-marijuana-dispensaries>allowing
for the authorization of 'compassion centers' in 2009. However,
Gov. Chafee suspended<http://norml.org/news/2011/10/06/rhode-island-governor-pulls-plug-on-state-s-long-awaited-marijuana-dispensing-program>the
law in 2011, stating, "[L]arge-scale commercial operations such as
Rhode Island's compassion centers (would) be potential targets of
'vigorous' criminal and civil enforcement efforts by the federal
government." Earlier this year, Gov. Chafee agreed to revisit the issue and
to work with lawmakers to amend the law so that a limited number of
small-scale distribution centers could apply for state licenses.
 
In response to the legislature's actions, US Attorney Peter Neronha
has said<http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wrni/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1932457/Top.Stories/Gov..Chafee.signs.bill.allowing.medical.marijuana.dispensaries>he
will continue to oversee the enforcement of federal drug laws.
However,
he has not specifically said whether 'compassion centers' will be targeted.
 
Three states – Colorado, Maine, and New Mexico – presently issue licenses
to allow for the state-sanctioned production and distribution of cannabis.
So far, dispensary facilities in those states have operated largely without
federal interference.
 
Similar licensing legislation approved in recent years in Arizona, New
Jersey, Vermont, and Washington, DC has yet to be implemented by local
lawmakers.
 
In February, Delaware Gov. Jack Markell announced that he was
suspending<http://blog.norml.org/2012/02/14/delaware-federal-threats-halt-governors-plans-to-implement-states-2011-medicinal-cannabis-law/>the
implementation of a similar licensing program in that state.
 
Rhode Island lawmakers
legalized<http://norml.org/legal/item/rhode-island-medical-marijuana>the
limited use and cultivation of cannabis for therapeutic purposes in
2006. Over 3,000 Rhode Islanders are presently authorized under state law
to use cannabis.
 
*For more information regarding Rhode Island's medicinal cannabis law,
please visit: http://norml.org/legal/item/rhode-island-medical-marijuana.*
— You are currently subscribed to norml_news as:
s..[email protected] unsubscribe send a blank email to
s..[email protected].
NORML <http://www.norml.org> and the NORML
Foundation<http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3380>:
1600 K Street NW, Mezzanine Level, Washington DC, 20006-2832
Tel: (202) 483-5500 • Fax: (202) 483-0057 • Email: s..[email protected]
 
 
Support Marijuana Law Reform <http://norml.org/join>
[image: From the blog] <http://blog.norml.org/>
Rhode Island: Lawmakers Moving Forward With Marijuana Decriminalization
Measures Details<http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/30/rhode-island-lawmakers-moving-forward-with-marijuana-decriminalization-measures/>
05/30/12 3:20pm EDT
Marijuana Law Reform Supporter Dethrones Eight-Term Incumbent in El Paso
Primary Details<http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/30/marijuana-law-reform-supporter-dethrones-eight-term-incumbent-in-el-paso-primary/>
05/30/12 9:59am EDT
Study: Cannabis Use Associated With Lower Mortality Risk In Patients With
Psychotic Disorders
Details<http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/29/study-cannabis-use-associated-with-lower-mortality-risk-in-patients-with-psychotic-disorders/>
05/29/12 6:48pm EDT
Silver Tour: Wall Street Journal Looks At Seniors and Medical Marijuana Use
Details<http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/29/silver-tour-wall-street-journal-looks-at-seniors-and-medical-marijuana-use/>
05/29/12 1:09pm EDT
It’s Time for Obama to Have His “Marijuana Moment”
Details<http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/26/its-time-for-obama-to-have-his-marijuana-moment/>
05/26/12 3:21pm EDT
 
<http://norml.org/join> [image: Write to
Congress]<http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=50800581>
Write to Congress <http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/alert/?alertid=50800581>
 
 
Cannabis and Driving<http://norml.org/library/item/cannabis-and-driving-a-scientific-and-rational-review>
 
[image: NORML Women's Alliance]
NORML Women's Alliance <http://norml.org/women>
 
[image: NORML TV]
NORML TV <http://norml.tv>
 
Other Ways to Help
 
Join NORML <http://norml.org/join>
Tell Congress <http://capwiz.com/norml2/home/>
Cafe Press Gear <http://www.cafepress.com/norml>
NORML Shop <http://norml.org/shop>
 
Networking
 
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/norml>
Twitter <http://twitter.com/norml>
YouTube <http://youtube.com/profile?user=NatlNORML>
Flickr <http://www.flickr.com/photos/12910591@N04/>
Tumblr <http://norml.tumblr.com/>
 
— You are currently subscribed to norml_news as:
s..[email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to
s..[email protected].
 
 
 
—
col0rado
Herald at Arms
of the Cannabis Nation
 
marijuanahomepage.com
#opcannabis

I must be doing something right … getting alot of angry emails from some
of y'all .. keep it coming; i'm in the mood to respond. It would help if
you pro-reg folks could say something other then how long you been fighting
the good fight; and that i'm full of shit. Frankly that just encourages me!
Why don't you ask yourself Hero … how effective can your really claim to
be, if after 40 years of fighting for the cause … WEED IS STILL ILLEGAL!
 
After you have humbled yourself; then approach me with a true debate on the
merits of AB2312;
 
I'm getting emails from some of y'all … you want to know who am I? I am
the SLASH OF WATER; WAKE UP! AB2312 IS BAD LAW!
 
col0rado
Herald at Arms
of the Cannabis Nation
 

Terry,
 
You are doing it exactly right because you are working for the narcs.
You remind me of Gary Stevens, a Calaveras Co. sheriff narcotics officer
that got on the nearly 2000 member Kubby list, AMMA, in 2001. Your posts
are remarkably similar in almost every way. We even got his (Steven's)
copy of the 3 volume CNOA manual that Judge Martin ordered he turn over
to defense attorney, Randy Moore, trying a case in the county. As per
those manuals, you follow instructions very, very well. This group has
seen several like you over the years. It's your job to disrupt and bring
into disrepute…..attack and divide.
 
Usually you folks don't last that long on these lists because list
managers/admins often just unsubscribe narc disruptors like you. On the
other hand, we all get to see what you drug war supporters are up to, so
maybe they will keep you around for awhile……either way, you have
exposed yourself. Good luck with that.
 
David Jack
 
On 6/9/2012 4:34 PM, Terry Colorado wrote:

Dear Jack,
 
Again; we have a messenger from the pro-reg crowd calling me a narc; no
substance about AB2312; just blind rhetoric and name calling.
 
Hmmm okay … i'll play "who's a narc" … isn't that like a pot calling a
kettle black; David? Alright; alright folks I admit it … me and Jack
David are narc's. We have been for years … right Jack? Tell em bout that
time last year when we stupidly thought we had competent and responsive
leadership that supported TRUE ACCESS and we supported the bad legislation
they pushed at us? Remember the good ole days Mr. Jack … david … david
jack david … bro your are so lucky you have two first names! So what's up
Jack … david .. wanna debate AB2312?
 
Or are you just gonna tell me some more war stories about how you been
supporting the pro-reg crowd for 40+ years? Since we are reminiscing; you
remind me of a history teacher i never paid much attention too. Is that a
double "o" … i can never remember.
 
Hold your threats: there is power in Anonymity; the name col0rado may come
and go; but the message will be the same; DO NOT SUPPORT RESTRICTIVE
REGULATION. We are legion and where there are Narco Warriors to battle;
Cannabis Nation will always have a Herald at Arms; for the liberation of
cannabis. amen.
 
col0rado
Herald at Arms
for the Cannabis Nation
 
marijuanahomepage.com
ASAbook.org ~ lol
#opcannabis
 
 

so true, you are getting a voice out here and it is being heard!!! We tried
for 2 years and they have done everything in their power to quite me. I
have the video proof and it's undeniable. They have the money backing their
moves, I just have The 1st Amendment. When you look at the "who's in" with
A.S.A. it soon becomes clear the game they play is "All 4 Keeps" Only room
for one king per thrown.
 
 
 
 
—
*
*
*
*
*William W. West*
*William W. West Productions*
*www.theweedlynews.com*
*www.myspace.com/williamwwest*
(phone#-removed)*

> "It's a matter of whether you sell it as a business or not."
 
RMLW wasn't "a business" – it was "justice within the economic realm". RMLW
and the Herer initiative were both level playing fields … Prop 19 and
this fucked up AB2312 represent privilege and injustice.
 
 
 
 
 
> "It seems odd to me that certain people seem to be against pot becoming
> commercially regulated, considering that a lot of people seem to be making
> money on it like it is and opposing change."
 
It's true there are those who are categorically against any regulation
whatsoever. And then there are those of us who just don't wish to see a
cartel form. You have reasonable arguments for the former, and you pretend
you are talking with the former when talking with the latter.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> Kind of like the dealers are in the same league as the big corporations,
> against any rules that might reduce their immediate profits.
 
No. The dealers just want to still be dealers – as should be their right
according to these pot activists, all of whom I respect:
 
*Michael Aldrich* argued that cannabis "should be controlled as alcohol is
controlled". [7]
 
In a 1971 issue of *The Marijuana Review*, a more detailed vision of
legalization emerged out of San Francisco, one with a strong inclusivity
sentiment:
 
"Opposing government monopoly of sale because it "presupposes that the
traffic is evil and therefore not to be left in private industry," and
government licensing of only a few vendors because "any system of licensing
that is more selective or restrictive than our present system of alcoholic
beverages control is fruitful for bribery and corruption," the Committee
simply urges: "The sale of Marijuana to adults can be regulated by laws on
the general order of those regulating alcoholic beverages." [10]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There was a 1972 version of Prop 19. It was far more progressive than the
2010 version of Prop 19 in that it refused to throw anyone under the bus. A
"yes" vote on the 1972 Proposition 19 would have revised California's laws
about to marijuana to "provide that no person in the State of California 18
years of age or older shall be punished in any way for growing, processing,
transporting, or possessing marijuana for personal use, or for using it.
[11]
 
The next example I came across of a vision of a post legalization world was
in an early issue of *High Times* magazine – the 1975 "Alaska Goes Legal"
issue. *The High Times editors* stated:
 
"The only reasonable solution seems to be to bring the present underground
distribution system aboveground – legally. *Each dealer would have his
small store, like a tobacco shop.* … Competition would keep quality high."
[12]
 
 
 
*Dr. Mikuriya *used the pages of *High Times* to come out in favor of
"complete legalization": a monopoly-busting 100 plant limit on home
cultivation. As well, Dr. Mikuriya provided a very interesting insight into
just how liberal the repeal of alcohol prohibition in the United States
actually was – a 250 gallon limit per person! [14]
 
 
 
At this time NORML – a cannabis consumer advocacy group – was beginning to
feel the pressure from the rank and file to expand their advocacy to
include "full legalization" – one which will protect "the Third World
growers and the neighbourhood dealers". [15]
 
 
 
The next year *Keith Richard* of the Rolling Stones threw his two cents
into the debate:
 
"If they can figure out a way of taking it over and making bread out of it,
it’ll be legal. The only reason methadone’s such a big deal in America is
because a lot of people are making millions on it. … I think they realize
that even if they sell 20 filtered Acapulco golds, real grass heads will
still be buying their stash from the man who comes over the border with it
under the floorboards of his truck. If you want good tobacco, you don’t buy
Newports or Marlboros. You go to some little tobacco stall and choose your
tobacco." [17]
 
 
 
Down in Kentucky, *Gatewood Galbraith* became the voice for the Kentucky
pot grower:
 
"I would seek to implement this plan whereby we allot our farmers a certain
poundage to grow each year. The farmer cannot sell to anyone else. He can
only sell it to the state. The state would be the middleman. The state has
a legitimate interest in taxing and controlling this substance. The state
would then package it, grade it for potency, and turn around and sell it
wholesale to licensed retail dealers around the state – the people who are
dealing now for a living.* The object is to spread the wealth as much as
possible. We don’t want the oil, tobacco, and liquor companies, or the
pharmaceutical industry gaining control of this market. It’s extremely
important that it be kept in the hands of the people who have put it
together over these last twenty years."* [23]
 
 
 
The 1990s brought with it pro-legalization groups other than NORML, and
they too spoke of inclusive models for the post-legalization economy. For
example, the hemp movement brought with it quotes such as this one from
Prop 19 supporter *Chris Conrad*, answering the question "who benefits from
relegalization?":
 
"For current cannabis consumers and *suppliers*, it removes the risks and
problems of operating in a black market economy and the fear and stigma of
prosecution. It allows them to be honest about their life styles and
pastimes with their friends, families, employers, doctors, elected
officials, etc." [25]
 
 
http://www.cannabisculture.com/node/25832
 
Damn … where did THAT Chris Conrad go? The one who was concerned with all
the suppliers? When was he replaced with a guy who would accuse the
suppliers who were opposed to initiatives that did not get rid of
discriminatory licensing of being against all forms of legalization?
 
Guys like Richard Lee who seek to ENTRENCH the old,
currently-existing-in-LA-and-Oakland discriminatory licensing practices, or
the ASA who seek to create a whole new set of discriminatory licensing
practices. Fuck them. They are the enemy. They stand for the opposite of
what the above people stand for. They are seeking to create an oligopoly.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> "When did the growers become "the man" fighting to keep everyone else
> under their thumb?"
 
They didn't. They just don't share your enthusiasm for oligopoly – they
know the difference between that and real legalization – legalization for
all.
 
 
 
 
> "Tokers, on the other hand, just want to be able to grow a little, share a
> little, and buy some whenever they want without risk of arrest."
 
Actually, they don't want to see a few lucky people sell all the pot.
That's why Prop 19 failed. That's why any oligopolistic initiative is
doomed to fail. Many people can see through the scam – enough to vote
against it and doom it to failure.
 
 
 
 
 
> "Most of the people I talk to like the idea of going to a local shop to
> buy it over the county and pay taxes like they do for their beer or wine."
 
Exactly. Like beer and wine. No oligopoly. And how many beer and wine
licenses do cities have?
 
 
Upon careful examination of the many documents available at the website of
the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control is one entitled “2005 Moratorium
Counties/Cities”. In it, we learn that:
 
*“*On January 1, 1998, Section 23817.5 was amended to permanently
establish a moratorium on the issuance of off-sale beer and wine licenses
(Type 20) in cities and counties where the ratio of Type 20 licenses
exceeds one for each 2,500 inhabitants. In the city and county of San
Francisco, the ratio has been established as one for each 1,250
inhabitants. The San Francisco computation combines off-sale beer and wine
license with off-sale general licenses for the purpose of establishing the
ratio.” (164)
 
In other words, there are “caps” on the number of retail outlets, but they
are in the thousands – even tens of thousands – for big cities, and in the
hundreds for smaller jurisdictions. For example, if Los Angeles, with a
population of 14.8 million, is allowed to have as many places to buy
off-sale Cannabis as off-sale beer and wine (one retailer for every 1,250)
then Los Angeles will have 11,840 Cannabis retail outlets. At the same
rate, San Francisco will permit 5,936 cafes, and Oakland, at the “town
rate” of one retailer per 2,500 residents, will permit 160 pot cafes.
 
http://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2011/07/07/Crystal-Clear-Glasses-and-Unbleached-Rollies
 
 
So if you support cannabis to be sold "like beer and wine", why do you
favor the consolidation of the market to upwards of 1 retailer for every
50,000 people, when the market for beer and wine is somewhere around one
retailer for every 1,250-2,500 people? Why are you in favor of a market
place 20 to 40 times more consolidated than the beer and wine market?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> "It's the narcs and dealers who like the status quo."
 
It's the people lucky enough to have a license, or those who wish to be in
control of handing out the licenses.
 
 
 
 
> "That's okay, but people can be a little more up front about it."
 
I'm upfront about "legalization for all". I'm up front about "regulating
like wine". It's you who is playing the "I don't see any pot oligopoly",
"all those who are saying they are opposed to an oligopoly are actually
opposed to all legalization" games. You're the one being deceptive, not me.
 
 

Kubby to sue me for libel over Headbook remarks….
Posted by Mickey Martin on June 9th, 2012
In what I can only describe as hillarious, Bill McPike, Steve Kubby’s attorney and fellow “Like Wino,” sent me an email threatening legal action if I did not remove my posts about Headbook and issue a public apology. Now I am laughing incredibly hard. The thought of Steve Kubby suing me for my commentary on his very public press release for his “weapons grade” weed trading and social networking site makes me giggle. 
Look here, Steve. If you wanted to talk about it you could have reached out to me. Sending McPike to threaten to sue me is just stupid. I suppose you will see me in court after I get served papers. But here is a little word of advice before you travel down that road…..think long and hard how far you want to take this. For better or worse, we may still have to work together some day. The choice is yours though, brother. 
Like I told Bill….
Sue me. I double dog dare you.
Here is the email I received from Bill McPike….
Hi Micky,
I represent Steve Kubby, who has directed me to your Libelous post on the www. As a favor to you, at this Time, I am merely asking that you remove your post, From all sites which post was made by you on June 1, 2012 In cannabis warrior and at least to Todd McCormick’s site, Save Cannabis readers, etc. Issue a public apology which I approve.
 Libel per se is where a (writing) (1) publication is made (2)    Which is false (3)  defamatory (4) Unprivileged (5) and accuses a person of a crime, harms reputation,
Or causes special damage.
Also: exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or Obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned, or avoided, or Which has a tendency to harm reputation or occupation. No damages need be proven, it the publication itself which Proves the damages.
 In case you can’t figure this out, look at how you labeled Mr. Kubby’s photo, and all the stupid things you say.
See: Yow v Nat’l Enquirer
Anybody in the world can Find this on Google & wherever else you placed this. 
Innuendo is enough.
The damage is done.
If I don’t hear from you, Mr. Kubby Will pursue all legal options available to him.
This isn’t for publicity, I do not expect to make draw any attention To this. This is between you & Kubby for now.
Bill McPike
 
Mickey Martin
T-Comp Consulting Director
Author of Medical Marijuana 101
www.cannabiswarrior.com
www.tcompconsulting.com
s..[email protected]
(phone#-removed)
http://twitter.com/micKEYmarTIN
http://twitter.com/CANNABISconsult
***The views expressed in this communication are not necessarily the views of T-Comp Consulting, Tainted Compassion, Cannabis Warrior any other group I am affiliated with.***

Right on the mark Mickey; 100 percent ACCOUNTABILITY. Sounds like some shit
bout ready to bust out in some Narco Warrior faces.
 
 
—
col0rado
Herald at Arms
of the Cannabis Nation
 
marijuanahomepage.com
#opcannabis

http://cannabiswarrior.com/2012/06/10/why-montel-williams-is-bad-for-weed/ 
 
 
Mickey Martin
T-Comp Consulting Director
Author of Medical Marijuana 101
www.cannabiswarrior.com
www.tcompconsulting.com
s..[email protected]
(phone#-removed)
http://twitter.com/micKEYmarTIN
http://twitter.com/CANNABISconsult
***The views expressed in this communication are not necessarily the views of T-Comp Consulting, Tainted Compassion, Cannabis Warrior any other group I am affiliated with.***

Lavonne, my property isn't worth what I owe on it and all the money I have
raised has gone to attorneys, i have spent more than 60 days in court in
the past year, that's one of the ways they get you is to keep you in the
court. (hint, you can't work and make money no matter where you work if
you're in court)
to take statements out of context rather than facts is as destructive and
ignorant if not downright libelous. Several of the statements posted hear
have no basis in truth. I am nearly finished writing an article regarding
the destructive nature of accusations. From unfounded charges by
prosecutors to "well meaning " advocates.
 
What if I published in a forum that I heard that Lavonne did something
really awful, and stole money from good people or anything for that
matter…..
these things are sucked up by onlookers as fact and leave a shock wave of
destruction.
unfortunately most people caught in the justice system end up taking a
deal and few are willing to fight.
To put any patient as more deserving of justice than another is a disgrace
 
to put down a defendant doing everything in his power to get justice in a
time where it's not easily had. is also abhorrent. this is one of our
"movement's" greatest issues. Who needs law enforcement, all you have to do
is stand up for your rights and someone inside will take a swing at you
sooner than later.
I have stood up for many and continue to do so. In fact Liz (my wife ) was
one of the few supporters at your prelim. ( I was in another court at the
time or would have been there as well) but instead of my wife being by my
side, I sent her to yours.
 
as a result of these accusations, I have had to defend my integrity to
those that are supposedly my allies while our enemies sit back and gloat.
As always I welcome anyone to visit, interview, or view anything in my life
as it has become an open book as a result of the "War on Drugs"
 
Again, I usually keep my mouth shut on this forum but when false
information is posted about me or my family I am compelled to respond. My
apologies in advance to anyone that is confused or harmed in any way. I
will not be engaging any needless pissing contest. nor will I respond to
this further on this forum. Anyone that wants to hear the truth from the
"horses mouth" please give a call(phone#-removed), send an email (
s..[email protected]) or come by for a visit 26521 Hammack Ave
Perris, Ca 92570
that's what transparent looks like.
oh yes!
NO one should go to jail for a plant
ever!
just sayin'
Blessings
Joe Grumbine
 
—
Blessings
Joe

lavonne;
 
Are you advocating a "Victim's of War" fund? I like the idea; a rich
industry can afford to think in this regard; it would also help nationally
as we can say that we take care of our own; i would prefer to replace 5
percent of the AB2312 tax with a tax that help the patients who need it the
most.
 
Thank you!
 
 
 
—
col0rado
Herald at Arms
of the Cannabis Nation
 
marijuanahomepage.com
#opcannabis

Everyone has been outraged by San Bernardino County’s ban on outdoor cultivation. It is not only another malicious attempt by the SB Co. Board of Supervisors to undermine Prop. 215 and SB 420, it is another example of what freedoms and scientific research our elected officials are willing to sacrifice at the altar of the War on Drugs.

Although San Bernardino County is not the first county to ban outdoor cannabis cultivation, it is the first municipality being hauled into court to defend their petty and mean spirited ordinance. Local attorney and medical marijuana activist Letitia Pepper has been doggedly pursuing her lawsuit to end this cultivation prohibition and this Friday, June 15, the day of reckoning comes due as San Bernardino will have to publicly defend their outdoor cultivation ban ordinance in a court of law!
 
Letitia is challenging the legality of the ordinance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under CEQA Letitia needs to show that adoption of the ordinance would have a significant impact in the physical environment, meaning that something significant to the senses — perceivable — would happen to the physical environment, not to people.
 
Letitia argues in her lawsuit that the increase in traffic of patients having to drive out of the county to get medicine would be such an impact and that the increased use of electricity by forcing outdoor growers indoors would have many negative physical impacts. The use of electricity by indoor marijuana grows reportedly accounts for 1% of the total electrical power consumption in the United States so it most likely accounts for the same in San Bernardino – so it is not inconsequential.
 
To learn more, this Monday, June 11 at 6p.m. listen in to our radio show Marijuana Compassion and Common Sense. Letitia will be one of our featured guests and will provide you with more details about the lawsuit.
 
The Monday show will also feature Tom Cook who is embroiled in a custody battle over adopting a toddler who was orphaned when the child’s 20-year-old mother and her unborn child were fatally stabbed by her boyfriend. Marijuana and Children’s Services Division play into this unfortunate situation which Tom will explain.
 
We will also be speaking with Joe Grumbine who will bring us an update on his and Joe Bryon’s retrial in Long Beach.
 
Join us this Monday, June 11 at 6 p.m. and every Monday at 6 p.m. for Marijuana Compassion and Common Sense on IE Talk Radio KCAA 1050AM and simulcast at kcaaradio.com.

Anonymity removes the power of organizations that use identity to
maliciously, slander; libel; alienate, and threaten; its never too late to
debate. Your group shaped the legislation to fit your agenda. When did
anyone have a chance to shape the legislation? Do you mean after your
organization stole 1 million dollars from the patients you pretend to
protect; and then shifted it over to lobby for AB2312; so your group can
control the cannabis market in California?
 
Is that your idea of participation Courtney Sheats? Do you support a
rewrite of AB2312 to remove all restrictive regulation; support Prop 215?
 
 
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Courtney Sheats <s..[email protected]
 
—
col0rado
Herald at Arms
of the Cannabis Nation
 
marijuanahomepage.com
#opcannabis

"Anonymity removes the power of organizations that use identity to
maliciously, slander; libel; alienate, and threaten;"
 
You mean, when you called me chickenshit on Facebook, unprovoked?
 
ASA stole nothing. I firmly stand behind ASA's work – my work, and the
integrity of our staff.
 
I refuse to give your words any additional weight when you haven't
participated in any of the discussions related to AB2312, which you have
had plenty of time to do. It was widely discussed that discussions and
questions relating to AB2312 would be given time during the Unity
conference and there were patients on both sides of the argument that
brought their ideas and concerns to that discussion.
 
Interestingly enough, you deleted my original comment from this
forward..??
 
On June 10, 2012, Terry Colorado wrote:
> [9] http://npomail.electricembers.net/tel:%28510%29%20251.1856%20×322
> [10] mailto:s..[email protected]
> [11] http://marijuanahomepage.com/
 
—
Courtney Sheats, Regional Coordinator
C: (916) 588.8672 O: (510) 251.1856 x322
 
Americans for Safe Access is the largest national member-based
organization
of patients, medical professionals, scientists and concerned citizens
promoting safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic use and
research. ASA is dedicated to meeting the immediate needs of medical
cannabis patients and their providers while creating a movement to
promote
safe and legal access. ASA works to overcome political and legal
barriers
by creating policies that improve access to medical cannabis for
patients
and researchers by engaging a multifaceted strategy that incorporates
public education, impact litigation, grassroots development and
advocacy,
media campaigns, and direct support services.

RCP is false report. The Sheriff was staging for El Camino. All activists
report to El Camino @ 2511 Connie Dr, Suite 200 in Sacramento.
 
—
The Committee for Safe Patient Access to Regulated Cannabis
Sacramento, CA
www.RegulateSac.org and www.CSPARC.org
@CSPARCsac
Find Us on FB Here<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Csparc-Sacramento(phone#-removed)741>
Phone:(phone#-removed)
Email: s..[email protected]
 
Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the
meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section
2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by
the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may
contain confidential information and work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY
PROHIBITED.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Contact: David Fiedler(phone#-removed) / s..[email protected]
* *
 
* *
 
*Laurel Dewey's Tender, Romantic, Funny Novel of a Conservative
Middle-Aged Widow’s Awakening to Love and Cannabis*
 
* *
 
*“Betty’s (Little Basement) Garden”
Raises Awareness Of Medical Marijuana*
 
* *
 
New York, June 12, 2012—Laurel Dewey, the Colorado author best known for
her Jane Perry mystery series, has written the first mainstream novel to
take a serious look at medical marijuana. *Betty’s (Little Basement)
Garden*(The Story Plant; June 2012; $16.95 Paperback; ISBN-13:
(phone#-removed)0),
introduces a dynamic heroine—58-year-old Betty Craven, elegant former
beauty queen and recent widow—who finds herself getting involved with
medical marijuana as well as with an intriguing and independent man.
 
 
 
Driven by memorable, colorful characters and packed with intrigue, humor,
romantic tension, and enlightening facts about the healing properties of
cannabis, Dewey’s novel gently raises awareness of this timely subject
matter while drawing readers into the story. Betty gradually comes to
question her long-held beliefs and principles, let down her facade, and
rediscover her true and amazing self.
 
* *
 
*Betty’s (Little Basement) Garden *keeps readers riveted and rooting for
Betty through every startling twist. In Betty, Laurel Dewey has created a
captivating activist for not only medical marijuana, but also for women’s
liberation, especially in midlife and after crises. *Betty’s (Little
Basement) Garden* is partly drama, partly romance, and thoroughly
entertaining.
 
 
 
Laurel Dewey writes this powerful and compelling novel partly based on her
own experiences living in rural Colorado, and partly on her own extensive
research and knowledge. While Jane Perry fans may not realize it, Laurel
Dewey (http://www.laureldewey.com) has written two books on plant medicine (
*Plant Power* and *The Humorous Herbalist*), along with ten booklets and
hundreds of articles on alternative health. She is also the author of a
Silver Spur nominated Western novella and three novels in her Jane Perry
suspense series—*Protector*, *Redemption*, and *Revelations*—along with the
Jane Perry novelettes *An Unfinished Death* and *Promissory Payback* and
the story collection *Unrevealed*.
 
 
 
“Quite pleasing and unique…interestingly done.” – Viviane Crystal, Crystal
Book Reviews<http://crystalbookreviews.blogspot.com/2012/05/bettys-little-basement-garden-by-laurel.html>
 
 
 
“Does not disappoint…characters maintain their charisma and charm and
draw you in…interesting and unique.” – Leslie Wright,
BlogCritics.org<http://blogcritics.org/books/article/book-review-bettys-little-basement-garden/>
 
 
 
“Compelling, emotional, at times humorous, controversial, heart wrenching,
inspirational…Highly recommend!” – Cheryl Mash,
Goodreads.com<http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/314494606>
 
 
<http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/314494606>

Word is Directors Suneet and Nick are IN CUSTODY…..
 
> > PROHIBITED.
 
> —————————————————————————
 
> > Attachment: http://drugsense.org/temp/fBQ9diPfbF16573.html
 
—
The Committee for Safe Patient Access to Regulated Cannabis
Sacramento, CA
www.RegulateSac.org and www.CSPARC.org
@CSPARCsac
Find Us on FB Here<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Csparc-Sacramento(phone#-removed)741>
Phone:(phone#-removed)
Email: s..[email protected]
 
Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the
meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section
2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by
the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may
contain confidential information and work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY
PROHIBITED.

Greetings everyone!
 
The CCHHI 2012 is now over and we can proudly report we have over 50,000 signatures "in house" with an estimated 100,000 plus in total !
We submitted the signatures on 6/6/12 to San Fran,Santa Clara,Solano,Santa Cruz,and Monerey Counties!
We were two days late in our submission thinking the turn in was on 6/6/12 when it was on 6/4/12!
The signature turn in was an act of symbolism to show the world that over 50,000-more like up to 100,000 support 100% Relegalization of Cannabis Hemp and freeing ALL NON-VIOLENT Cannabis Prisoners!
We attained over 50,000 signatures -more in the mail and more never sent in-with only roughly $25,000 spent!
We will circulate the wording to the Cannabis Community-ONCE AGAIN-and will begin the next signature drive roughly around May 15,2013!
We did this without the help of: NORML,CANORML,ASA,Jeannie Herer,Debby Goldsberry,Stephen D Angelou,High Times,West Coast Leaf,Skunk Magazine,and zero support from Save Cannabis as well!
We have a solid 50,000 signatures to prove and show that there is massive support for 100% Legalization and the release of ALL non-violent Cannabis prisoners!
We have built up a network of grassroots activist and professional petitioners!
We have gone against the tide of this elitist Cannabis movement and allowed 50-100,000 to show there is support out there for 100% Relegalziation!
This is bigger news than anything you all talk about in this group ! We are actually attempting to end the war on Cannabis!
You all should tell everyone that the CCHHI 2012 got up to 100,000 signatures without the support of the Cannabis Reform movement!
There will be at least 3 Cannabis initiatives in 2014 and we r starting the CCHHI 2014 next May 2013!
Please look in the mirror when u want to change the laws! See that reflection in the mirror ? That reflection is the source for change ! U are the catalyst for Legalization!
Wow,could u imagine how well we could have done with your support ? You,the leaders of the Cannabis reform movement!
We got over 50,000 solid signatures with the number probably closer to 100,000 an we did this without YOUR help!
Instead ,SOME of U criticized us and ridiculed us saying Jack Herer's CCHHI 2012 would never fly ! People like Pebbles who bad mouthed out petition because it releases non-violent prisoners!
Guess what-Pebbles and crew are 100% wrong!
So,next time quit bad mouthing Jack Herer's CCHHI 2014 and don't send messages Saying Jack's petition asks for too much !
Thanks,
Michael Jolson
CCHHI 2012
(phone#-removed)

 
Sent from my iPhone

EVERYBODY INVITED!
 
MARIN ALLIANCE CLUB REUNION AND BENEFIT
 
SUNDAY JUNE 24TH, 2012 FROM 1 PM – 4 PM
 
AT DEER PARK VILLA, 367 BOLINAS RD., FAIRFAX
 
with keynote speaker –
LP Vice-Presidential Candidate Judge Jim Gray
 
ADMISSION – whatever you can donate to help avert the crisis.
 
Lynnette Shaw misses everyone very much, and would love to see the MAMM family that was ripped away from her by the unfair Federal action that closed the Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana forever.
 
She is having to declare bankruptcy due to the crushing of her beloved charity organization. The house she bought with her late father's money may be seized due to the staggering bills she is stuck with.
 
PLEASE HELP. Write a check for any amount and send it to :
Lynnette Shaw, POB 426, Fairfax, CA 94978
 
Volunteer some time. There is an overwhelming pile of boxes, souvenirs, awards, records, paintings and furniture in four storage lockers that are at risk of being lost due to no money.
 
If you have a suitable job for Lynnette, please let her know ASAP.
 
For more information, call(phone#-removed) ( CBC Marin Delivers) or(phone#-removed)
 
SEE YOU ON SUNDAY JUNE 24TH FROM 1PM – 4 PM AT DEER PARK VILLA!