Tag Archives: SFmcdGroup] Fwd: DPFCA: Second Vallejo pot dispensary raided, 400 plants, hundreds of products seized

March 2, 2012 – Digest for s..[email protected] – 10 Messages in 6 Topics

 

 

 

 

 

    El Camino Wellness Center <s..[email protected]> Mar 01 11:51AM -0800  

    Do you guys think that we should have our patients send letters to
    Feinstein and Boxer in Sacramento? I cant remember if the politics of
    whether they are "our" senators exactly.
     
     
     
     

    Thank you,
     
     
    S. Kumar
    Executive Director
    El Camino Wellness Center
    www,elcaminowellnesscenter.com
    "A Community of Compassion"

     

    Starchild <s..[email protected]> Mar 01 05:27PM -0800  

    Not much better. "I believe that medical doctors should be allowed to use their best judgment in deciding the most effective treatment for their patients" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of cannabis freedom. (The statement itself seems rather meaningless — if a doctor wanted to prescribe faith healing for a seriously ill patient instead of treating the person with modern medicine, would she really be in favor of allowing that? I highly doubt it, even though her statement taken at face value means that she would.)
     
    Senator Boxer says that if and when legislation prohibiting enforcement of federal anti-marijuana "laws" is introduced in the Senate, she will "keep (our) views in mind". No promise to introduce the legislation in the Senate herself, not even a promise to vote for it. Gee, thanks Barbara.
     
    Love & Liberty,
    ((( starchild )))
     
     
    On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Dr. Brazil wrote:
     

     

 

    Starchild <s..[email protected]> Feb 29 11:06AM -0800  

    Shona,
     
    I totally agree, and the cost of government ID cards doesn't even stop at the cash you have to fork over to get one. There is a hidden cost in civil liberties of allowing laws that require us to obtain government-issued cannabis cards, as well as the possibility that any local, state, or federal government registry that is created may later be used by authorities to target people for persecution.
     
    To address a point raised by Bud, I think our *friends* in law enforcement already know that cannabis isn't as dangerous as government advertises it to be. In fact I think the rest of law enforcement pretty much knows it too, and that it is really only their desire to keep the money flowing to their agencies and themselves, along with their love of power and the authoritarian desire to control our lives, that keeps most of them from embracing legalization.
     
    As for mainstream society, I don't see how our buying into the argument that cannabis must be regulated by government is supposed to convince anyone that it's *less* dangerous. Isn't it the *unsafe* things that are supposedly most in need of being regulated?
     
    Love & Liberty,
    ((( starchild )))
     
     
    On Feb 29, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Axis of Love SF, Shona Gochenaur wrote: